Greg Sankey clarifies future scheduling plans between SEC, Big Ten programs
Greg Sankey has addressed the idea and previous reports that the SEC and Big Ten could soon be engaged in scheduling challenge-style regular season matchups on the football field.
During a Thursday appearance on “The Paul Finebaum Show,” Sankey admitted a lot of people have written about the idea after a recent report, but not many have asked the SEC commissioner about the endeavor head-on. Sankey went on to break down the scheduling potential into 3 categories.
“There are really 3 ways to look at regular season scheduling. One is you’ll see more games between SEC and Big Ten members. That’s being done naturally at the campus level as our members look to schedule Big Ten members, I think that’s really healthy for college football,” said Sankey.
While that endeavor is happening between programs, Sankey went on to caution people about “overpredicting” the scheduling opportunity of the two leagues. At this juncture, Sankey said coordination between the SEC and Big Ten offices is not ongoing.
“The second is should the conferences be involved at the conference office level in more coordination? We’ve talked about that. There are currently no plans to do so,” Sankey claimed. “… I think we need to be really careful about overpredicting this scheduling opportunity.”
RELATED: College basketball tipping off and the stretch run of college football is the perfect season for DFS action! Be sure to use SDS’s Fantasy betting apps for all your gaming needs.
Sankey’s third scenario was a direct reference to the idea of “challenge” style matchups that have been featured throughout basketball season. Sankey stopped short of predicting such events will occur.
“Third is some of the things we’ve done with challenges. That’s been done in basketball most notably… Might we have more intentional opportunities to schedule with our Big Ten colleagues in a different way?” questioned Sankey. “That’s a lot of work and I would not begin predicting that will happen.”
Altogether, it sounds like more SEC vs. Big Ten games are indeed likely to be coming down the pipeline, but it might not be a major shift to anything on the schedule.
Commissioner @GregSankey expounds on the relationship between the @SEC & @bigten especially when it comes to regular season scheduling pic.twitter.com/uLGknGpGQw
— Paul Finebaum (@finebaum) November 14, 2024
I would rather go to a 9 team conference schedule than be forced to play a Big Ten team. I would like to play KU every year as our power 5 non-con opponent. I imagine South Carolina would prefer to play Clemson vs. a Big Ten team etc.
Maybe the non-playoff teams could do a SEC Big 10 Challenge at the end of the year instead of the increasing uninteresting bowl games that we have witnessed the past few years.
I think playing a Big10 team would help to not let an undeserving team like Indiana make the playoff. In a year like this, that could be the difference in a 4th or 5th SEC team making the playoffs.
And based on pre-season rankings that game this year might well have been Mississippi State vs. Indiana-which wouldn’t have resulted in a loss for the Hoosiers.
My updated 3-6-6 permanent opponents
Alabama: Auburn, Tennessee, LSU
Auburn: Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi State
Arkansas: Texas, Mizzou, Oklahoma
Florida: Georgia, LSU, Tennessee
Georgia: Florida, Auburn, South Carolina
Kentucky: Tennessee, Vandy, South Carolina
LSU: Texas A&M, Alabama, Florida
Miss St: Ole Miss, Auburn, Vandy
Ole Miss: Miss St, Texas A&M, Vandy
Mizzou: Oklahoma, Arkansas, South Carolina
Oklahoma: Texas, Mizzou, Arkansas
South Carolina: Georgia, Kentucky, Mizzou
Tennessee: Alabama, Florida, Kentucky
Texas: Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Arkansas
Texas A&M: Texas, LSU, Ole Miss
Vandy: Kentucky, Ole Miss, Mississippi State
You could sub Arkansas vs. OU for Arkansas vs. Ole Miss.
Texas A&M vs. Ole Miss for Texas A&M vs. Oklahoma
“Miss St: Ole Miss, Auburn, Vandy.” Where do I sign up for that?
Once you throw in the remaining 6 teams (which don’t include the permanent opponents) the schedule will be plenty tough.
Ole Miss and LSU should play annually under a 3-6-6 set up. Same with Tennessee and Vandy.
I have previously had Tennessee and Vandy, but for this proposal I changed because I think Florida vs. Tennessee is a more intriguing matchup.
Also, for LSU which team would you prefer Ole Miss replacing?